Difference between revisions of "Gender essentialism"

From FeministWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Insert link to page in Portuguese)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
Trans activists frequently use the misnomer "biological essentialism" when arguing against the reality of biological sex.  They say that it is "biological essentialism" (and therefore somehow bad) to argue that women, by definition, are anatomically female humans.  This might in fact be a form of [[Wikipedia:Psychological projection|projection]] resulting from the unwillingness to acknowledge the criticism of their own gender essentialism.
 
Trans activists frequently use the misnomer "biological essentialism" when arguing against the reality of biological sex.  They say that it is "biological essentialism" (and therefore somehow bad) to argue that women, by definition, are anatomically female humans.  This might in fact be a form of [[Wikipedia:Psychological projection|projection]] resulting from the unwillingness to acknowledge the criticism of their own gender essentialism.
 +
 +
<!-- Language links: -->
 +
 +
[[pt:Essencialismo de gênero]]

Revision as of 00:46, 8 May 2020



This article has little content. You can help FeministWiki by expanding it. Fill out the Registration Form to become an editor.

Gender essentialism refers to the belief that women and men have a certain essence to their personality in connection with their gender. Concrete examples include the belief that women are gentler, more passive, more easily frightened, and so on, whereas men are stronger, more active, more courageous, and so on. In other words, gender essentialism is the belief that traditional gender roles and gender stereotypes are inherent and natural to the sexes.

Feminists are strongly opposed to gender essentialism, as it's used by conservatives to argue that sexist social hierarchies are natural and inevitable.

The concept of gender identity which forms part of the basis of transgender ideology is arguably a reformulation of gender essentialism, which is why many feminists oppose it.

Trans activists frequently use the misnomer "biological essentialism" when arguing against the reality of biological sex. They say that it is "biological essentialism" (and therefore somehow bad) to argue that women, by definition, are anatomically female humans. This might in fact be a form of projection resulting from the unwillingness to acknowledge the criticism of their own gender essentialism.